Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mims' second studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wizardman 19:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Mims' second studio album

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Even though there were some sources of the upcoming album, it fails WP:MUSIC. Like the deletion of the article II Trill, the album is not as much sourced. Dunno if the sources make it notable because they're just forum threads.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Crystal-balling right now; only sources are forums as nom points out. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Crystal balling with no reliable sources to back it up (2 are forum posts, one provides a 404 error). Recreate if and only if a tracklist and specific release date can be proved through WP:Reliable sources independant of the artist and record label. -- saberwyn 03:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as crystalline, can be recreated when it exists.  tomasz.  11:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

It should not be deleted because the album will be released in June and there are plenty of sources to back that up and plus the album isn't out yet how do you expect a tracklist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Signshare (talk • contribs) 22:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no WP:RS, as indicated above, ultimately no verifiability. Recreation supported only when a reliable source can be provided. -- Kinu t /c  01:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, people seem to want to be the first to create articles, end up jumping the gun. Blast Ulna (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Nearly all the sources sources are forums. It should be recreated if there's more reliable sources. Spellcast (talk) 06:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.