Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mina-Jacqueline Au (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Mina-Jacqueline Au
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

this article survived an AfD 5 years ago when standards were not as stringent. The article reeks of self promotion, not surprising as it was created by a single purpose editor. Founding a non notable company doesn't really add to notability. And Luxury Lifestyle Connoisseur" and "Style Expert" is extremely dubious. LibStar (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Promotional. Gamaliel  ( talk ) 19:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable. Promotional. Olivier (talk) 15:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Given we have a prior keep close, I'd like to see a stronger discussion before potentially closing as delete, so relisted. Courcelles 06:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This article must be appalling for the poor woman. Has she asked for it to be deleted? I think we should oblige her. The "notable" reference has been relegated to an external link somewhere down the line. Thincat (talk) 10:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I suspected it was created by herself. LibStar (talk) 13:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.