Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minakshi Mukherjee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Minakshi Mukherjee

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP of the leader of a party youth wing and unsuccessful election candidate. Does not pass WP:NPOL. Mccapra (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NPOL, which includes Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage and specifically in footnote 8, A politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists, and sources that were in the article and have since been added to the article: A Minakshi in the battle of Goliaths (The Indian Express, 2021), Minakshi Mukerjee seeks to regain CPI(M)'s lost glory in Nandigram amid clash of titans (YahooNews/PTI, 2021), Meet The 36-Year-Old Up Against Mamata Banerjee, Ex-Aide Suvendu Adhikari (NDTV, 2021), West Bengal Assembly election 2021, Minakshi Mukherjee profile: CPM candidate to battle heavyweights Mamata Banerjee, Suvendu Adhikari (FirstPost, 2021), In Nandigram high decibel battle, a faint cheer for CPM (The Indian Express, 2021). She also has not previously been low-profile (so not WP:BLP1E), e.g. Police and Left youths clash, bandh today (Telegraph India, 2012). Beccaynr (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Beccaynr. Powerful Karma (talk) 03:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Beccaynr stated above. Poppi fied  talk 07:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Beccaynr. There is more than standing against the sitting CM of West Bengal. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete A non-elected politician does not satisfy WP:POLITICIAN. And this is not the platform of increasing Keep votes.GermanKity (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Beccayner. Their list of sources shows significant press coverage. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. By its own terms, WP:NPOL does not require the deletion of articles that pass the WP:GNG. The sources presented by Beccaynr do indeed satisfy the GNG, consisting of thorough profiles instead of routine campaign coverage. And the fact that she wasn't obscure prior to running prevents any WP:BLP1E concerns, as this essay cogently explains. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.