Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MindDecider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

MindDecider

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Thinly veiled promotional article. Author has an apparent conflict of interest, and seems to be on a campaign of creating related articles that lead to this product through links. Few references, and only one with a link. No reliable sources with independent coverage that I can find. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy as spam This is not thinly veiled promotional, it is using Wikipedia to astroturf. The author of the article points to their "new and novel" software which came out in 2009 with references dating back more than a decade, to 1999 and 1991. The sources are not about the software, but about the management concepts the software tries to use. Miami33139 (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As noted, the given references have nothing to do with the article's topic and seemed to have been added merely to avoid an "unreferenced" tag.  I could not independently locate anything reliable on the topic other than an inordinate amount of press releases and self-published cruft.  In full disclosure, I have also recently blocked one of the primary authors of this piece for repeated copyright vios and as a single purpose promotional account (admins check the deleted contributions for some interesting key word mining attempts; i.e. redirecting 'effective tool' to this article).  Concur with nominator; this is a simple marketing campaign.  Kuru  talk  12:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am not able to find any reliable sources for this article. - MrOllie (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.