Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindbreeze


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Mindbreeze

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article. Does not seem to pass WP:NBUSINESS. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 16:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Very promotional, unsure what exactly they do or why they do it better than others. Oaktree b (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly a promotional article, about run of the mill software, that doesn't pass the notability guidelines. So, this is a pretty obvious delete in my book. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete- blatant advertisement. Reyk YO! 09:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete clear advertisement. TolWol56 (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This UPE hasn't even made an attempt to plug-in PR references. Its all scrap profile pages. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIRS.   scope_creep Talk  09:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass notability - a very clear promotional article. A-NEUN   &#10686;TALK&#10686;  09:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Not delete Why we can't update the article? The company is mentioned at Gartner, Forrester, Forbes together with companies such as IBM or other software companies. or as well as listed in the GSA Federal Acquisition Service . Eco30 (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Not delete Shure needs an update, but the company is mentioned at Gartner, Forrester, Forbes together other software companies . or as well as listed in the GSA Federal Acquisition Service . IrisMargareteF (talk) 08:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Not delete This article needs an update. Nevertheless their products are in wide use e.g. from companies like the FDA. This is clearly a relevant vendor in that space (cognitive services, insight engines, enterprise search). .Dfallmann (talk) 10:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Canvassing is not allowed under any circumstances on Wikipedia. All three of you, and, count as paid editors and need to explain their conflict of interest. Bringing in two of your employees to suggest keeping the article while not disclosing that they are all Mindbreeze employees is a blatant violation of our trust, and I imagine the closing administrator will keep that in mind. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 13:55, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. We are not a webhost for press kits. Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 14:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC) (This discussion was linked on the Discord, but I was not asked to participate)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.