Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindful Spending


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  07:00, Dec. 25, 2005

Mindful Spending
While I agree with the practice, I'm not sure I see where this article is going. In addition the phrase "Mindful Spending" seems to not be in wide use, so if the content is kept we should maybe find a better name for it. --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 06:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC) ''Note: relisting 15/12/05, which seems to be 14/12/05 for most of y'all. How sad! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not much to add to mindfulness article. --Squiddy 11:52, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. There may be similar concepts that go by different names, but we could have a redirects. Wikikiwi 21:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Frugality, does not appear to be the blogger's invention. Gazpacho 01:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to be only a rather obvious dictdef with little chance for encyclopedic expansion. └UkPaolo/TALK┐ 16:48, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Google search came up with 63 examples so not widespread and not many verifiable sources. Capitalistroadster 22:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, just "mindful" + "spending" and few google hits. Possible promotion. Kappa 05:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless vastly expanded. Seems like a modern conceit if I've ever heard one. - Naif 16:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.