Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindquarry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 09:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Mindquarry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No references to establish notability; product no longer in active development Dandv (talk) 08:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Dandv (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: No strong opinion on this, and no vote yet, but I was able to find a fair amount of coverage, at least some of which appears to be reliable sourcing. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. No real evidence of notability and has the faint smack of advertising about it (even if it has been discontinued). Lord Cornwallis (talk) 01:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per the news coverage Andrew Lenahan showed above. --Apoc2400 (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep --Per the news search provided by Andrew Lenahan, notability is not temporary.--J.Mundo (talk) 18:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.