Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindscript

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 00:03, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Mindscript
I wish I didn't have to do this, but there is no evidence that this is a notable software package -- certainly not notable enough to need references in rapid application development and open source, as 84.217.42.74 (talk &bull; contribs) did. The article is long on adjectives and short on facts, and the facts contradict the adjectives: we're told the development is "very active" and yet the Sourceforge page says there's one developer, no submitted bugs, no submitted patches, no submitted support or feature requests -- the forums only contain 4 messages. I'm sorry, but this is just advertising. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:21, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree with Antaeus Feldspar. It's not very well written either. :-S   &mdash; Frecklefoot | Talk 22:00, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's thin 'cause it's a software ad. Wyss 01:04, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - David Gerard 00:31, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.