Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindteck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 10:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Mindteck

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page does not seem to meet notability guidelines; it does little more than state the company exists and the fields it works in. The author asserts it meets the guidelines, but the sources given are either associated with the company or republished press releases of announcements which does not meet WP:ORGDEPTH. 331dot (talk) 11:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep: Multiple secondary sources covering financial information about the company (some press releases, but some original works). Easily meets WP:GNG. I'm surprised this was nominated for deletion - at best it would require a bit more looking for sources as I'm sure there's information in newspapers, etc given the decent online coverage. Appable (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I withdraw this proposal; the sources were added afterwards. 331dot (talk) 20:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.