Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mindy Yang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Mindy Yang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is being written by User:Superego who has stated they are being directed by Superego see Superegomanagement. It is promotional in tone and may not meet Notability VViking Talk Edits 15:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Although the article falls short of the level of blatant spam that would justify speedy deletion, it is still clearly promotional in character (created by an editor working for Mindy Yang's management company). Also, despite the attempt to give the impression of notability by bombarding the article with references, notability is not demonstrated. Some of the references are not substantially about Mindy Yang, some are clearly promotional. (Perhaps the single most blatant example is a reference to a page at the website www.psfk.com, the "about" page of which is full statements such as "Our reports provide insights into trends driving creative business and our audiences access thought leadership from pioneers at our events. PSFK Labs, our consulting service, provide corporations with trends-led strategy, concepting, content and delivery", which is elaborate marketing-speak for saying that they market businesses.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane  talk  01:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete There are hardly any good secondary sources providing significant coverage. I mean the most significant one I could find was Ex-lover accused of stealing boutique owner’s social media domains -NYPost which I don't think I would add to the article anyway. Other sources such as Guardian contain only a quote by the subject. I guess this is WP:TOOSOON. In addition, the promotion by article creator is not acceptable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.