Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mineral CSA (brand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 14:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Mineral CSA (brand)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article about a brand which is non-notable as lacking independent, reliable references. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Search as I might, what comes up are largely passing mentions and descriptions based on this article. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 15:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete neither this brand nor Excellerator (brand), another of the parent company's products, appear to be notable. Created by the same editor who made few other controbutions all seemingly related to this industry. I don't see an assertion of notability so if it hasn't been prodded or otherwise disputed before I would recommend pronptly deleting both. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.