Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mineral Resources


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Moved the article to Mineral Resources Limited as per sources added on the article. (non-admin closure)  ❯❯❯  Chunky aka Al Kashmiri   (✍️) 08:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Mineral Resources

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article fails WP:GNG and doesn't meet WP:CORP. —  The Chunky urf  Al Kashmiri    (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)  06:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —   The Chunky urf  Al Kashmiri    (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)  06:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ─  The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  06:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep as an important mining company in Western Australia at the moment due to size and extent of operations. AFD seems a bit strong for such an obvious keep. JarrahTree 06:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The company is a listed public company that operates a number of iron ore and lithium mines in Western Australia, and other mining-related businesses in the Pilbara, the source of most of Australia's iron ore. Further, it is clear, even from the references cited in the article (independent sources, including government publications) that the company passes both WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Bahnfrend (talk) 07:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.