Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ming Kipa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  16:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Ming Kipa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see any long-term notability with someone who was the youngest person to client Everest for a brief period of time. She was the holder of this record for seven years but I don't see how every person who held this record would be sufficiently notable for a separate article. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    11:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    11:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep No reason to destroy the article on children like this. She deserves a fair chance and we need to counter systemic bias here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.121.98 (talk) 19:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep find it amazingly shocking that even for a moment this should be considered for deletion! Surely the deletionists have indeed taken over and are running the show. Mathmo Talk 16:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC) Keep. No objection to the American who won but clearly a problem when a young Nepalese woman accomplishes something. For shame. 166.170.49.149 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The first three keep !votes do not provide guideline- or policy-based rationales for article retention. North America1000 06:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment These type of articles should be merged into an article titled (along the lines of) Youngest Mount Everest climbers record. There does already exist an article on List of Mount Everest records. Having independent articles for these youngest climbers doesn't match the notability guidelines (if that's all that they have ever been known for).-- MarshalN20 T al k 21:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Weak - mainly because there isn't much to say beyond the four sentences here, so it's not much of an article. However, the list of records just gives a name, and doesn't allow for even those four sentences. A combined article about the young climbers would be a good idea, and when someone decides to create that, they can then redirect from this. That said, I am dismayed at the accusations of bias on the part of some commenters here. Please assume good faith. This article is minimal so it does make sense to bring it to AfD. LaMona (talk) 05:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.