Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ming Mang Mung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Ming Mang Mung

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined proposed deletion. It's pretty clear that "Ming Mang Mung" is a game made up in school (or somewhere like that) one day. There are no sources provided, no relevant Google hits, and no claim to notability. I recommend deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - An online created sport does not warrant an article. Res2216firestar 04:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The only contributions are going to come from the founders of the game, as the article mentions. There are obviously going to be no references. So I don't think it will ever meet up with verifiability or notability guidelines.  C h a m a l  talk 04:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)  C h a m a l  talk 04:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the author can really turn this around. It's a thing made up one day. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowy Delete. For all we know, this is a hoax.  Not to mention impossible to establish WP:V or WP:N for that matter.  Digital Ninja WTF 06:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete with no objection to WP:SNOWballing it. This seems to be very clearly something that was made up in school one day.  The google test, which is no longer considered reliable because it can so easily be manipulated to over-estimate notability shows all of seven results - and none of them refer to the subject of this article, except, of course, the result which is this article.  There goes WP:V and WP:N.  The prod was contested by the article creator, and I dare say no one established editor of this encyclopedia will object to deletion of this article.  &hArr; &int;Æ S   dt  @ 08:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. David WS (contribs)  14:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per all of the above. Fails WP:V, WP:N, WP:NEUTRAL, and WP:MADEUP. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:MADEUP is pretty much verified, by the way, by the statement in the article that the creator is "just waiting for contributions from the other founders of this game." A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete if possible. 76.66.201.13 (talk) 06:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Deflate, Dilute, Delete Sounds sort of like fun, but it's not an article. Mandsford (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, but curious how an editor could be accused of a conflict of interest if this thing is as made-up as it appears. Doesn't there have to be an interest that someone could actually be conflicted about?--otherlleft (talk) 23:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, I assume you're referring to the conflict of interest tag which was placed on this article by an anonymous editor. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.