Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ming Veevers-Carter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 00:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Ming Veevers-Carter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not asserted, can't find substantive independent sources Reywas92Talk 22:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep A gold-medal winner at the Chelsea Flower Show means that she passes WP:ANYBIO as that puts her at the top of her field. Andrew D. (talk) 23:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * That's "a well-known and significant award or honor"? They have a number of awards in a number of categories and I wouldn't expect that to make the winners automatically notable. Reywas92Talk 00:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment She also published several books during the 1990s: Festive Decorations, The Step by Step Art of Dried Flowers, and Celebration Flowers, so she's had a long career, and she may well meet WP:CREATIVE. I will see if I can find reviews, profiles, etc. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Andrew Davidson's reasoning. That is a notable award in her field, and only the best in that field would be making such large displays for the Queen of England.   D r e a m Focus  15:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Andrew 9H48F (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree that a gold medal at the Chelsea Flower Show meets WP:ANYBIO. (And yes, for anyone interested in flowers and gardens, they are well-known awards, and well reported in the media.) The article has improved referencing since it was nominated for AfD. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.