Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mingle (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 04:12, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Mingle
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to have any extensive coverage by secondary sources Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gong   show  00:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete reads like a brochure, does not establish notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to fail WP:GNG. Ducknish (talk) 23:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Borderline advert with run of the mill coverage for software and nothing that would make it stand out. Mkdw talk 23:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.