Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minhaj Shifat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Minhaj Shifat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has lack of significance. Could not find any news related to him in google. Thus article has not pass WP:MUSBIO. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 04:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete The bd24live article is a decent start, but gonomanusherawaj seems to be just an edited-down rehash of it. Searches of the usual types, including by Bengali script name, found brief mentions in the Bengali press, but nothing as substantive as the bd24live piece. Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not yet convincing of solid independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  19:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.