Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MiniMax (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

MiniMax (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a startup firm with only routine coverage about their fundraising. Fails to meet notability with significant coverage about the company. Whpq (talk) 14:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Routine funding coverage, isn't terribly useful. Company is still new, might not have enough coverage yet in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * All I can find are the funding items from Reuters and the "China Money Network", which doesn't feel RS-ish. Oaktree b (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree that these are routine coverage, and a couple also sound like a press release. Maybe consider to DRAFT the page and wait for more coverage.Perfectstrangerz (talk) 20:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * This was in DRAFT but the author decided to move it to article space without using AFC. -- Whpq (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Neutrality: It seems that the quotation is not enough, and more information and reports need to be collected ~ Thank you for pointing out the problem ~ Carleyeta(talk) 14:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify – Somewhat routine coverage, this feels a bit like WP:TOOSOON. TLA  (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.