Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minimum intrusion Grid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Minimum intrusion Grid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Both sources are primary, appears to fail software notability and general notability as a source search suggests this doesn't have the requisite significant coverage.  SITH   (talk)   18:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, unexpectedly enough. A Scholar search is more informative: There certainly is a high preponderance of the same names popping up (notably B. Vinter), but more than a few people seem to have picked up the concept and talked about it or done something publishable with it - by the looks of it, beyond the circle citing that often goes on in labs. Article urgently needs to make use of some of that sourcing though... -- Elmidae (talk · contribs)
 * Oh, and needs to be moved away from the capital G. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd be convinced - but look, all of those top hits have a single (co)author: "B Vinter". As such, I am not convinced this concept received independent attention. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I see references to a specific model or project called "Minimum intrusion Grid" which is abreviated MiG. (a possible play on words with the Russian Aircraft Corporation MiG.) Is the article title a considered a proper name? --mikeu talk 03:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is some academic coverage, but most of it limited to a single author. Single-person concept tend to not be considered to have significant impact until others start publishing about them. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NEO. Can't find any coverage where B Vinter is not directly involved. ~Kvng (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks notability due to too few independent reliable sources. It is too soon to create an aricle on the topic. It might become notably discussed in the literature in the future. At that time a well written article would be appropriate. --mikeu talk 16:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.