Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minister Jade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Minister Jade

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems to have been a one-time event coverage and there's not much information about this and my searches found no better links than this. With the article an orphan and no current article for Steve Bialik, there's not much to suggest improvement and keeping and this has existed staying the same since February 2009. Notifying author. SwisterTwister  talk  06:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: I'll do some cleanup and make this into a page about the comic rather than the character, because if it's going to be kept it'll be for the book's notability and not the individual character. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - After Tokyogirl79's edits, it looks like it's worth keeping. If it ends up sticking around, I'll de-orphan it. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.