Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minitokyo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Minitokyo
No evidence of passing WP:WEB, not so many sites links to this one. (Liberatore, 2006). 15:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Comment - Alexa rank of 9,805, and one of the main "anime wallpapers" websites - the difficult bit is proving it (and I'm not sure if that's enough to keep the article anyway. -- makomk 16:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- DOTHC 21:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This one is hard to say. 218K members would certainly make it pretty notable, but there ought to be sources about the site, I think. The page as it stands seems somewhat self-serving. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 21:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment To me WP:V is more important than membership numbers. ColourBurst 22:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:V is a big problem for an article that otherwise would have been kept. -- Nish kid 64 23:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm a member of the site, but yeah, I haven't seen much coverage of it in outside sources. So sadly, this article has got to go. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 23:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Alexa rank doesn't matter for keeping or deleting. Any number range for making decisions based on alexa rank is purely arbitrary.  The test is at WP:WEB i.e. non-trivial media coverage, non-trivial award, or non-trivial media repritn of content.   It is nice wall paper, and if Museum of Modern Art decided to do an showcase them at an exhibit next month, it would pass with flying colors...  However, that's not the case and the article provides no evidence that it passes our web notability guidelines.   --Kunzite 00:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I seem to remember expression an opinion to delete this before, too. Had it not been nominated previously? I guess I'm thinking of something else. Regardless, it still fails WP:WEB. GassyGuy 08:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.