Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minor characters in Monarch of the Glen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. Mo0 [ talk ] 16:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Minor characters in Monarch of the Glen
Delete -- Not notable/unencyclopedic, articles like this are turning wikipedia into a series of tv fanpages.  max rspct  leave a message  16:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Monarch of the Glen is a major BBC series. Articles like this are created as a compromise in the hope of keeping deletionists hackles down. Television is a legitimate subject for wikipedia to cover, as well as whatever you are interested in. Bhoeble 19:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * A compromise? Because they're all in one article? - max rspct  leave a message  19:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Monarch of the Glen is a popular British TV series that has been going on for many years, thus characters are notable, thus keep. Englishrose 20:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - better this than a single page on each minor character. Reyk 21:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above Jcuk 23:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. We need more like this. -- JJay 03:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Astrokey44 |talk 03:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, much prefer this to an article for each of those characters. Stifle 01:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP is not collection of everything. List of minor characters in a TV product is prime example of information that will be useless within few years. If people are judged by their notability in longer time span why should be TV products treated differently? Pavel Vozenilek 21:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.