Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minor power objects in Sonic the Hedgehog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  22:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Minor power objects in Sonic the Hedgehog

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article simply reiterates content exclusive to each game, and is game guide in format, and even then it's very minor content. Nothing really for notability either, individual game articles can cover this subject well enough. Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - "Minor power objects" are Not notable by the definition in the wikipedia general notability guideline, because there are no reliable sources independent of Sonic the Hedgehog that deal with the subject matter. Randomran (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - No assertion of of notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per every argument above in their entireties ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Help 17:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a game guide. Unencyclopedic and on the verge ofWP:GAMECRUFT.  --Pmedema (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't belong on Wikipedia.--EclipseSSD (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, the word minor is a synonym for not notable. GO-PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 00:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Soniccruft. JuJube (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article is too much detail per WP:NOT. Gazimoff Write Read 16:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)It is also heavily reliant on primary sources
 * Delete. No reason for it to exist, it's simply an indiscriminate collection of information. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NOT, as well as WP:WAF for being completely in-universe. Asserts no notability to meet WP:FICT. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 09:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 09:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.