Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MintTwist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

MintTwist

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet WP:ORG guidelines. The first reference provided is a promotional blurb with no indication as to why the company is of significance, and the other a press release. Google news returns nothing reliable. Fairly obvious COI present too. Contested PROD. Electrified Fooling Machine (talk) 09:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC) The Middle Eastern magazine feature on MintTwist is not a Press Release and was in no way comissioned or purchased by MintTwist. The foreign office approached MintTwist to run the feature because they felt it was relkevant in a market where there are relatively few Web Design companies who are based on the groud. The press release by the UK Department of Trdae and Industry on the trade mission was not created by MintTwist - it was created by the UK Department of Trdae and Industry press office. Understood on the point re Google news.Elliottking99
 * Delete nothing but a few self published press releases. Ridernyc (talk) 10:06, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * comment: No one has claimed that the Middle Eastern magazine mention was a press release. However, the intent of that aspect of the magazine is to promote UK interests in that region. I don't know weather they wrote it independently, or asked you to provide them with material to be included, but in this specific situation I don't think it matters because what is written can be viewed as nothing but an advertisement. As for the press release, I don't think it matters who released it when it comes to WP:RS. Electrified Fooling Machine (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.