Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mint popping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete-- JForget 01:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Mint popping

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable drinking game. Wikipedia is not for something made up in school one day. Delete. Evb-wiki 12:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete made up in school one long drunken week. JJL 14:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speed-D. While it may not clearly fall into the standard WP:CSD categories, it should under WP:SNOW assuming no significant (and reasonably argued) objection is raised on some proper grounds.  Non-notable local frat or party game, not reliably sourced, no assertion of notability, an original-thought and made up how-to guide for getting drunker.  No realistic hope of improving article - clearly made up by the boys - Stevo, Kiwi, Teeps, Big D, Si Man the Man Man and Irish, bless their hearts.  If it becomes a notably national or global trend, like Beer pong has, then maybe we can talk.  In fact a merge/redirect to Beer Pong might be an alternative solution, if there is a significant and a well-reasoned desire to keep the contents - especially if this game is in the process of spreading far beyond the creators.  --T-dot ( Talk/ contribs ) 16:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * For the sake of optimal completeness, an argument to keep was made within the article when the prod was removed. --Evb-wiki 17:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Good heads-up. I also added that "Why this should stay" commentary verbatim into the article's talk page for easy reference by others.  --T-dot ( Talk/ contribs ) 18:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per common sense. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.