Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minuto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Minuto

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Non-notable brand of noodle, the company itself does not even have an article. Read like an ad, too. WooyiTalk to me? 22:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No article at de-wiki, either.  Eliminator JR Talk  23:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr13 08:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Nonnotable food - especially after you eat it. :) Wikipedia is not a cookbook. Yechiel Man 08:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keepThe article doesn't seem excessively cookbook-like to me. It just describes the product. I don't see where the accusations of advertising come from either, but I may not be seeing the right version for that. Ultimately, this comes down to a determination of prevalence that will likely necessitate consultation of non-english articles. If the claims of the article are accurate as to its entry into the vernacular, it should probably be kept. Deranged bulbasaur 09:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable brand of food. The content itself is hardly unique, most instant noodles are prepared the same way. It definitely hasn't been talked about in culinary magazines as I checked the web.--Kylohk 11:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.