Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mir:ror


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  The Nordic Goddess Kristen  Worship her 22:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Mir:ror

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This RFID reader has only existed for a short while, and may not have achieved sufficient notability for inclusion. The article may serve a primary purpose of promoting the item instead of describing it in encyclopedic terms, whether or not that was the intention of the author. Richard Cavell (talk) 15:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * delete I am inclined to agree with the assessment that it has not achieved sufficient notability for inclusion in Wikipedia after a Google search. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - I've rewritten the article and added references.  Linguist At Large  21:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Keep If TikiTag (which I started/did a lot of work on) can be brought to a more acceptable state, than Mirror can be also. --Christopher Kraus (talk) 00:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - I rewrote this article to include reliable sources that establish notabiliity a few weeks ago. Also, hasn't this reached the end of the discussion period (about five days)?  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  01:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep-- Article is sourced and has been rewritten since nomination. Somebody should close this AfD. --J.Mundo (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.