Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mir Mohammed Helal Uddin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Mir Mohammad Nasiruddin. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Mir Mohammed Helal Uddin
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Son of a notable politician. He has never been elected to public office, but is active within the party. The cited sources are passing mentions, not significant coverage. Searches found slightly deeper news coverage of his conviction for helping his dad conceal illegally acquired assets (he got 3 years, daddy got 13).

He has only been written about in the context of his father, so my sense is that he is not notable. He is not a suitable subject for a stand alone article; he is a footnote to his father's biography. There is no content worth merging, but I could agree to a redirect to Mir Mohammad Nasiruddin, where his conviction is already mentioned. Worldbruce (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Crime,  and Bangladesh. Worldbruce (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator's solid research.  ——Serial Number 54129  18:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. This is authentic bio — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Nationalist 80 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)  — The Nationalist 80 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * @The Nationalist 80 Nothing in the nomination suggested that it was a hoax. Instead, the concern is that the subject is not notable. —C.Fred (talk) 19:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete he never got as far as the ballot paper, so really just an aspiratoinal politician. He may have inhereted a perchant for doing crime, but notability is not inhereted. D'n'B-t -- 18:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.