Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mir Sarwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 23:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Mir Sarwar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

not a notable actor. Hasn't played main lead roles yet. Side roles only. --  Jammumylove  Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 07:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --  Jammumylove  Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 07:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Unless you can provide information that the sources in the article are bad to the point where he no longer has any significant coverage in multiple sources, then being a "side" role actor doesn't mean anything. Macktheknifeau (talk) 08:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete Fails GNG Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete GNG requires reliable and indepdent sources, not just sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: I think the nominator has not done proper WP:Before and the argument that he has not played any major lead role yet is completely wrong. I did WP:Before and found the actor had some notable roles in multiple number of movies and webseries. See  . And this source  clearly says You must have seen Bollywood actor Mir Sarwar playing important roles in several films like Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Jolly LLB 2 and Kesari apart from featuring in some web series including The Family Man, Bard of Blood, Bhram and Special Ops. Now, he is all set to collaborate with Akshay Kumar for the third time in Laxmii . I also have concerns regarding the attitude of the nominator towards Kashmir related articles. See . Here he nominated it without doing any WP:Before just like he did here.  Also see this  and this  Im not saying the nominator is completly wrong. But he/she has some Pro-India sentiment for article's related to Kashmir like he declared in his userpage. An article does not have any reliable sources doesnt mean we should delete it. Proper steps like WP:Before should be done first., please dont nominate any articles no more for deletion without doing any proper steps just because you dont like it. Regards Kichu🐘 Need any help? 07:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:NACTOR; actor has multiple signficant roles in notable productions as clearly stated in that 4th source. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per NACTOR; significant roles doesn't have to be a lead roles. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, a quick search confirms that this actor meets NACTOR. Kolma8 (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.