Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mira (2023 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:53, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Mira (2023 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON, the film has not even been confirmed its release date, just saying 2023.--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 12:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 27.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 13:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hello, Yes, I understand that the film is still in production, and will be released only later in 2023. However, this film is made by the company Mars Media which has a long track record of successful films. Er nesto (talk) 12:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON Donald D23   talk to me  14:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Soft Delete It could be relevant/gain more information in the future since it has notable director, producers/production company, actors, etc. and the filming process has already begun but it should have been a draft instead of being moved to mainspace immediately.Jaguarnik (talk) 08:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG and WP:NFF. Per NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, ... films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." There is nothing here to show any notability of production. And if they think it will take over a year from now for post-production work... not notable enough in their minds to get it done sooner. Doesn't qualify for a standalone article. Delete. Platonk (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.