Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mira Adanja-Polak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Speedy Deleted (G11/G12) by. . (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010' •  (talk)''  01:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Mira Adanja-Polak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP with no sources. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an unsourced resume per WP:PROMO. Subject fails WP:GNG, WP:BLP and WP:V. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What kind of boilerplate argument is that? Subject certainly doesn't "fail" WP:GNG, as even a casual Mira Adanja-Polak demonstrates. Likewise, the subject does not "fail" WP:V, the article does. How about some basic WP:BEFORE? No such user (talk) 11:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * ...having said the above, speedy delete as copyright violation of http://www.adanja-polak.com/en/homepage/ . There is apparently no salvageable version in history, as even the first is a copyvio of http://www.adanja-polak.com/en/broadcasts/. Add to that promotional tone, it's a poster child for WP:TNT. No such user (talk) 11:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.