Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirago


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Jaranda wat's sup 02:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Mirago
It's a POV attack against a non-notable company. The whole thing should just be deleted. Cyde Weys talkcontribs 00:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I speedily removed the attack bits. No vote. FCYTravis 00:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a search engine company. -- JJay 01:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It's still a really crappy article though. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 06:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * That's probably true. But are they really as NN as you say? -- JJay 07:00, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, Mirago.co.uk has a Alexa rank of 10,070. It's not Google, but not all that bad either for a company providing internet services. They seem to get visitors. - Mgm|(talk) 10:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. If it was up to my opinion I'd vote delete. But, as much as I may dislike it, they are notable. --Ezeu 13:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep With attack bits removed, is ok as a starter stub.  xaosflux  Talk / CVU [[Image:CVU2.5.PNG|16px]] 17:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep looks fine to me now.Gator (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep looks fine but needs expansion.Gateman1997 00:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the fixed version. Stifle 10:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.