Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirametrix Research


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Mirametrix Research

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Companion article to the one on Hennessey nominated above. Non-notable technological firm. non notable academic technologist; Adjunct professor with a few publications. Article created by subsequently-banned sock-pupeteer active in creating articles on marginally notable technical companies and their executives.  DGG ( talk ) 09:14, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Most refs are in very obscure web publications. Fails WP:COMPANY. Tijfo098 (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another paid sock'n'schlock article on a company that is long on promotional cash but very short on notability, assembled with a jumble of sketchy cites, mostly primary sludge mixed with bloggy onanism mixed with dishonest paraphrase of other sources--in other words, a typical paid hack job.  In technical terms, fails WP:CORP per lack of WP:RS. Qworty (talk) 01:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete onanism. Logical Cowboy (talk) 12:55, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.