Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Garrison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Even nominator seems to think this is keepable based on presented RS. BusterD (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Miranda Garrison

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, only source is a blog post from 2001, a filmography, and a video the subject is in. A quick google doesn't reveal any sources that could be added to back any of this up. FrederalBacon (talk) 00:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Dance,  and Film. FrederalBacon (talk) 00:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Nom Withdrawn Let's make this easy, in the intervening almost month since I listed this, there have been significant changes to the article, adding more sourcing. I think the subject now meets GNG, so I will withdraw the AFD, since no one seems to be to keen on commenting on it either way anyway. FrederalBacon (talk) 15:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Firstly I object to "a quick google" being what is quoted here. The searches that should inform a deletion nomination are detailed here: WP:BEFORE and having done that, I see plenty books confirming that she is indeed a well known actor and choreographer. I added them in. As far as dance films go, Dirty Dancing is a classic and she was the dance coach for the star. That appears to have kicked off a long career in choreography, acting and directing. I think she passes WP:CREATIVE. I saw weak because there are lots of passing mentions, rather than lots of writing, but in the context of CREATIVE allowing notability based on the notability of the works, she's clearly played roles in very many blockbusters. I think we need to be mindful that she was born in 1950 and worked in the 1980s and sources are likely going to be offline. CT55555 (talk) 01:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * For the record, the "quick google" is a flippant way of describing the actual looking into her I did. I found her mentioned, A LOT, in passing, in articles about the movies she has been involved in, and in passing in articles detailing notable choreographers she has worked with, Kenny Ortega obviously being chief amongst them. And while she may meet certain specific project guidelines, every article still has to also meet GNG, and passing mentions galore doesn't indicate the "Significant Coverage" part of GNG. "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." FrederalBacon (talk) 06:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with CT55555. User:elfelix
 * Keep, notability established by CT555555. Mujinga (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I have no idea how your signature ended up merged into CT55555's above, but I have corrected this for you. I couldn't quite work out at first who the original !vote was made by. Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 07:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero  Parlez Moi 08:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Oh that's weird, must have been a typo on my part, thanks Bungle for the fix! Mujinga (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.