Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Gibson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 04:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Miranda Gibson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

She is only known for one event, and thus does not pass notability as per WP:ONEVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources 5 and 6 are enough for GNG. Rest is gravy. Oaktree b (talk) 00:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep She's easily searchable online, has recognition from other notable people. The article could/should be expanded, especially with the success of her activism and the resulting expansion of protected lands. Marleeashton (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Environment,  and Australia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. That's an awful lot of coverage. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added 2 new RSs to what already seems ample to satisfy GNG. Also noting that WP:ONEVENT states "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate. " Cabrils (talk) 04:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per sources, including newly added ones. Damien Linnane (talk) 04:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.