Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Rumina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Article needs some trimming though. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Miranda Rumina

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable Slovenian painter. Eleassar my talk 10:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, I found a few references that might go towards notability. If anyone can read slovanian, please take a look at [this]. -- Nuujinn (talk) 22:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I've added what sources I could find and incorporated them into the article. The article itself is still a mess, but I don't want to put much more effort into until I get a sense of how this AFD will go. I think she does just reach notability, passed on articles from RTC Slovenia and interviews with Auroville Radio. Please take a look. -- Nuujinn (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep for the time being per Nuujinn above and to give him the opportunity to work on the article. It's difficult to assess Slovenian sources, so if anyone knowledgeable on the subject can comment, I'm open to reconsider.  Ty  21:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The hand-waving nomination needs to explain why the sources supplied are not satisfactory. Colonel Warden (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The article has undergone significant revision in terms of sourcing since the nomination. What I wish we could find would be some references establishing conferrance of some awards.-- Nuujinn (talk) 14:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Nuujinn has made quite a lot of improvements. Sources seem to indicate notability.  D r e a m Focus  10:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.