Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Veljačić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Miranda Veljačić

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Definitely accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to show she passes WP:GNG. Searches turned up dozens of mentions of her, like those which are currently in the article, not of which are in-depth.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @Onel5969 most of them are in depth. Some of them are direct quotes. --Zblace (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 23:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. Granted, no single source meets the "significant coverage" criterion of the WP:GNG, but taken together they do provide coverage sufficient for a Start to C class article and do indicate accomplishments which would normally be roughly enough to consider the subject notable in her field. GregorB (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @GregorB thank you for being against @Onel5969's formalistic and deletionist approach and more for holistic understanding of a regulation. I am somewhat confused by no "significant coverage"... I hope you do not expect a single interview of all of life-achivements from mid-career practicing professional. --Zblace (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Significant work has been done to this article since it was first put up for deletion. Several publications with links to the original source have been added which demonstrate in-depth coverage as first requested by onel5969. The practitioner has presented in the context of the Venice Biennale which is arguable one of the most well-known art platforms worldwide and therefore should fall under the notability guidelines. --Rosa(SiC) (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.