Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirco Braccini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Mirco Braccini

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

As noted on the article's talk page in more detail, Braccini fails to meet any of the WP:CREATIVE, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:N notability criteria. While the article lists a number of references, many are self-published and therefore not reliable sources. The remainder do not serve to establish notability, as they are not articles about Braccini; they are merely articles for which he was hired to provide photographs. Having his work included as part of a number of articles does not satisfy the notability requirements; the requirement is for articles where Braccini is the subject of the article. I have yet to find any such references. I put a note on the article's talk page 20 days ago looking for anyone to provide evidence of notability; none has been presented. The article, a BLP, reads like a resume and makes numerous claims not substantiated by the cited references. ⌘macwhiz (talk) 04:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  —⌘macwhiz (talk) 04:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  —⌘macwhiz (talk) 04:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  —⌘macwhiz (talk) 04:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Nominator does a sterling job of distinguishing between mentions in third party sourcing and actual coverage. I have found no evidence of significant, independent coverage. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  09:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.