Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Beloglovsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Miriam Beloglovsky

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP (possible WP:AUTOBIO) of a writer, not properly referenced as passing our notability criteria for writers. This is written in a promotional tone rather than a neutral one, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability -- her own website, her own staff profiles on the websites of directly affiliated companies or organizations, GoodReads, her own books metaverifying their own existence on online bookstores, and on and so forth. But the notability test for a writer is not passed by using her own self-published web presence to verify that she exists, it's passed by using reliable source media coverage about her work to externally validate that it's actually as significant as her PR agent wants to make it sound. Even the "awards" section doesn't clinch her notability all by itself, as even that is sourced entirely to the self-published websites of the awards themselves, rather than any evidence of media coverage to establish that any of said awards are notable awards. Not a single reference here is reliable support for notability at all, and nothing stated in the text is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have considerably more reliable sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia articles need to be built on 3rd party sources, not on souces connected with the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.