Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Meyerhoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Miriam Meyerhoff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no claim to notability per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics), no third party sources, even created with the orphan tag, as though to merely fill a redlink Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Google scholar is a third party source and her google scholar link shows an h-index of 20, which is pretty much out of the ballpark for the humanities. Add to this the fact that she holds full professorships at two first-rate universities and appears to be being used as a poster-child for one of them. The worldcat link shows three separate books held by > 500 libraries (meeting Criterion 4). Maybe internet was on the blink when the nominator did their WP:BEFORE checks? Stuartyeates (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 02:39, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.   -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 02:40, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 02:40, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Editor of several very widely held major reference sources, and a standard textbook, which I added -- but I don't blame anyone for wondering at the notability on the basis of the original extraordinarily sketchy article   DGG ( talk ) 04:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Editor of three major reference sources.  DGG ( talk ) 04:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.