Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete without prejudice towards a sourced recreation. No one has found any reliable sources, nor are any cited in the article, but there is some discussion that they might exist. If they can be found, they article maybe recreated. Eluchil404 (talk) 08:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Mirone

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found nothing that shows that this software is notable. SL93 (talk) 02:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete; according to this sentence of the article, "The code is written in MATLAB", it cannot be an independent software and probably it is a simple program made by a user. There were no sources that confirms it's notable. ● Mehran Debate● 05:09, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * This article shows that it is far from a simple program, nor do I agree that MATLAB cannot be used to write other applications. Unscintillating (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 22:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice to recreation I'm not that interested in analyzing 569,000 Google hits for [+mirone +software graphics] in order to induce the absence of notability, when there are no sources in the article and all of the material fails WP:V.  Just remove the article, and if someone wants to write a new article with sources, then they should be encouraged to do so.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - A google scholar search shows the software being used, but no independent coverage of the software. -- Whpq (talk) 15:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.