Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Grujičić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 09:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Miroslav Grujičić

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD, no consensus that Serbian First league is fully pro. Original rationale: Player does not seem to have played in a fully professional league nor senior international football and so fails WP:NFOOTY. no indication of any additional achievements that have garnered sufficient significant, reliable coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Both sources listed in the article confirm he made four appearances in the fully pro Serbian SuperLiga for BSK Borča, meaning the article meets WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't see the Serbian league on WP:FPL. Am I being totally blind or has it been removed in error? Happy to withdraw if it has been removed. Fenix down (talk)
 * , I removed the Serbian SuperLiga from FPL here, it was not referenced to a RS. GiantSnowman 18:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I missed that. The league probably is fully pro but without sources to confirm, we can't use that as a source of notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps can help find a source? GiantSnowman 18:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Give me some time, but I have never dealt really with that issue of league professionality, all I know is that the top league of Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro/Serbia is professional since the 1970s. FkpCascais (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Pardon me, the league was fully-professionalised in 1967 (source: "Moving with the Ball" by Pierre Lanfranchi and Matthew Taylor, pag. 119) and I beleave ever since that was not changed. But I´ll try to get a source for current state of the league. Any help is also welcomed. FkpCascais (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * This is the document every player of SuperLiga needs to have, it is called "Professional contract" and within it includes the "point 2" where it has a place for including the players wage. (here is the Professional contract). Is this OK? FkpCascais (talk) 02:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * There is a Serbian/English version (here) however it doesn´t include a spot for adding players salary as the "only Serbian" version, which I posted above, does, but here it clearly says "Professional players contract" and every player needs to have one. FkpCascais (talk) 02:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks good, but unless I'm missing something the source doesn't actually say that all players are required to have such a contract. If you can source that we're all set. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:54, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hum, I see. That document is under a section (in the left column) which translated means "Contracts and documents regarding registration", and I already read that all players need to be registered (only registered players can play). I´ll try to find where I read that, it was somewhere in the documents regarding league regulations. Another question is that seems that same applies for the Serbian First League (second tier) as well. There are 2 contracts: the professional and another one for scholarship (which I am certain that is for players under 17, but I´ll try to bring where it says that). In the only Serbian version of the scholarship contract (here) under Члaн 2. the first empty space is for adding the players salary. FkpCascais (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - We have always considered Serbian Superleague fully professional. It looks as though someone deleted this from WP:FPL without any discussion whatsoever in Talk. Looking at the league regulations it's quite clear that all the players must be licenced, with various quotas. Nfitz (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * - I removed the Serbian SuperLiga from FPL as I have already said. There was a discussion that the only source present was not reliable, some leagues were then removed but others (including Serbuia) were missed. They have all since been removed. GiantSnowman 08:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Nfitz.--Yacatisma (talk) 08:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - the Serbian SuperLiga appears to be a WP:FPL from the sources present here, so the player meets WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Happy to withdraw the nomination based on the sourcing above. Fenix down (talk) 08:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.