Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirza Ahmad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 21:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Mirza Ahmad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. At least 3 WP:SPA contributors, including the creator and another whose username indicates WP:COI. I couldn't access the Times article. Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm leaning towards considering that the chief legal officer of England's second city probably is notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources include in-depth here and quoted here and mention here and mention here and mention here and quoted here and mention here and mention here and quoted here and if one searches using this string there are more quotes and mentions. The BASIC rule says If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability so we can combine the numerous one-sentence and one-paragraph references to establish notability. He was a power player in Birmingham government but at the same time, the current article is too long, with unsourced material, but if kept should be trimmed down to only what the references say. At present, the wiki-article is borderline WP:SPAM.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.