Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirza Ahmad (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Mirza Ahmad
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable attorney, also fails WP:NPOL, WP:GNG, despite run for mayorship. Amon Stutzman (talk) 10:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Law,  and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT nothing here indicates notability despite an AfD in 2014 that included a keep vote remarking that and this was borderline spam. Looks like it’s been edited by the subject too. Mccapra (talk) 11:20, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. As I said before: I'm leaning towards considering that the chief legal officer of England's second city probably is notable. Has held a number of notable positions. Not a politician, so WP:NPOL is utterly irrelevant (funny how many times that one is cited for people who don't fall within its purview). -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I think the ref to NPOL was to make precisely your point - although the article talks about roles in local government he did not hold elected office, so cannot be an NPOL pass. Mccapra (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * By that standard, every single person on the planet who isn't a politician fails WP:NPOL, so its citation is fairly pointless! -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This reads as if it were a resume, but doesn't demonstrate how the subject is notable. riffic (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.