Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirza Mohammad Abu Tayyab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Mirza Mohammad Abu Tayyab

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Academic who doesn't meet WP:NPROF. While this isn't a reason for deletion, this article has been a magnet for sockpuppets who've created a lot of articles on local professors. Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC) Please don't delete it and it is good for Wikipedia. He is a teacher in so big college. What the point to delete the article. People come to Wikipedia for articles. If you delete every new article what the point then to contribute in the Wikipedia. So my opinion is not to delete the article. Mirza Mohammad Abu Tayyab — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemistya7 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)   Blocked sock: Sockpuppet investigations/Patna.f --Blablubbs (talk) 17:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Liz Read! Talk! 00:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as the subject is clearly not notable. Wikipedia is not Hello magazine. Mccapra (talk) 05:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: NN Prof. Please also WP:SALT. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * And actually make this speedy as WP:CSD. Original author is a WP:SOCK. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Ineligible for G5. The sock collection was uncovered and blocked after the article was created; G5 is only available for articles created by someone evading a past block. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per all of the above; does not meet NPROF. Eagleash (talk) 09:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.