Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misérable Miracle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Henri Michaux. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Misérable Miracle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  12:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Article is woeful, vote for delete.IIlolII (talk) 12:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The comments above are woeful. A Nobel prize winner considers the subject to be worth discussing: see Journeys into the abyss. Andrew D. (talk) 22:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Andrew, please stop making comments that could be read as attacking other contributors, as you did here, at Articles for deletion/Drill commands, several other instances I linked there when I warned you about these remarks, and most heinously at Articles for deletion/List of breakfast drinks (2nd nomination), where virtually all your comments consist of nothing but attacks on, and assumptions of bad faith on the part of, the nominator. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 09:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Henri Michaux. Without touching on whether the topic is notable enough that a decent article could be built out of it, the present page is a useless content fork. Currently the article on Michaux tells us that he is Belgian and that he wrote a book called Miserable Miracle: Mescaline in 1956; the title links to this article where we learn that it is a novel written by Belgian writer Michaux in 1972. If we corrected the clearly false claim that it was published in 1972, the only piece of unique information in the fork article would be the claim that it is a novel, which Amazon implies is not even the case (both it and Google call it an authobiography/memoir). Even if the article weren't total nonsense that gets the genre and publication date wrong, it would just be a hindrance to navigation. (Note that I actually do think the topic is notable enough for a standalone article. I hope it gets one one day. I might even write it if I can find the time.) Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 09:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.