Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misbah Mumtaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Misbah Mumtaz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable model/reality show contestant. Fails WP:NMODEL --John B123 (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete fails to meet Wikipedia:NACTOR. --Saqib (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment I am not allowed to comment here so accept my apology to editors and administrators, i need to mention here that Misbah Mumtaz is a first Pakistani model from Gilgit Baltistan (Hunza Valley) and there is no other model from that state/city as being said by English Newspapers.

Misbah was the runner up and in top 3 finalist of Miss Veet Pakistan 2014 a contest by Miss Pakistan World she is also mentioned in different newspapers including Pakistani and Americans. in the public interest this page should be rescue as she is a only single model from Gilgit Baltistan. Memon KutianaWala (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


 * These 02 news stories about her Rhinoplasty is not enough to satisfy WP:NBIO. She must receive significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. And being runner up in a non-notable event like Miss Veet Pakistan does not make a difference either.--Saqib (talk) 11:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Also a note that being a runner up doesn't mean someone is notable. Winning the actual Miss Pakistan World, perhaps would but not a contest that is dime a dozen from yet another pageant. Praxidicae (talk) 12:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete we do not have enough and broad enough reliable source coverage to show actual notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.