Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miscellaneous topics on cities and population


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  03:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Miscellaneous topics on cities and population

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Extremely vague scope, linkfarm, not sure what the purpose is. A category would surely work better. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with that. ― LADY GALAXY 05:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree as well... Can't add much more than that. --Sin Harvest (talk) 05:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, too vague by far. Any article whose title starts with "Miscellaneous topics..." is almost guaranteed for deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - "Miscellaneous topics" is a description of Wikipedia itself, not any individual Article within it. (vagueness, simply put) Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  07:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. vague, possible WP:SPAM vio. Doc Strange (talk) 07:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not necessary when we have categories, and totally vague and possibly subjective.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 00:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, appears to be a part of a topical index (List_of_environment_topics:M). There are always going to be these sorts of "miscellaneous" topics that don't fit anywhere else.  Lankiveil (complaints 03:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.