Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mischaela Le' Anne Elkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Mischaela Le' Anne Elkins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. red dog six (talk) 03:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Bio is not backed up by reliable sources that establish notability. Edge3 (talk) 03:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Only sources are from LinkedIn, for Pete's sake... --Randykitty (talk) 22:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Poor sourcing, and the whole thing reads like a self-promo piece, especially given the author's cross-wiki edits only have to do with this subject. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 15:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.