Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misconceptionsabout african history


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Misconceptionsabout african history

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem like a Wikipedia article. A lot of "We" in the article, and because of this (among other reasons) it would need to be fundamentally re-written in order to qualify for notability. ~ Preceding post created by larsona //Talk// 19:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per WP:Original research. It reads a lot like an academic essay, which is not the appropriate tone for Wikipedia. If one really had a strong case for its notability, it either must be substantially rewritten, or better off as a subsection in the main History of Africa article. GabeIglesia (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I'd say "academic essay" is giving it too much credit. Reads like a high school WP:ESSAY, which the author has then copied, quite badly, into Wikipedia. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete -- It is so bad it is hardly even an essay. It is badly written.  If it has been better, one might have considered merging it as a historiography section in History of Africa article, but it is too dreadful for anything but deletion.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as a poor essay, not an encyclopedia article. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree that this articles is poorly written, and needs more sources. But I don't think that's a reason to delete it, it just needs to be improved. There are a lot of other articles on misconceptions about various topics. I'm sure that a competent expert can easily find sources that give this articles its requisite notability. I've added a template saying the article is in need of an expert to improve it. Joseph Clay, Jr. (talk) 20:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary with other articles. This is a fork, and a poor one at that. DreamGuy (talk) 23:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.